Categories
BLOG

sc lottery statistics

Top 10 SC Lottery Scratch Offs RANKED!

How did you pick your last SC Lottery scratch off? Did you go for that flashy new game or was a certain ticket calling your name?

However you picked it, chances are you wasted your money. Sorry. It’s not your fault. No one told you there was a better way.

What if you knew which games had the best odds of winning?

Wouldn’t that be amazing? You wouldn’t be guessing which game to play. You’d have an advantage. Your very own lotto edge.

Keep reading because your luck is about to change.

SC Lottery Scratch Off Odds

South Carolina Education Lottery scratchers vary from one game to the next. Not just the catchy names or ticket price either.

Each game has its own odds of winning. Those odds vary from game to game and even between similar prizes. No two instant games are the same.

Knowing these odds can give you an advantage!

Wouldn’t you want to buy games that give you the best chance of winning? Let the sucker behind you in line waste his money.

About Overall Odds

The simplest way to compare South Carolina Education Lotto scratch off odds is using the “overall odds”.

The overall odds of winning are the odds of winning ANY prize in a scratch off game.

The overall odds remain the same throughout the life of a game and are typically printed on the back of a scratch ticket.

If you want to know the best chances to win anything on your scratch off, the overall odds are the way to go.

The overall odds are available from the SC Lottery website. If you had spare time, you could collect the overall odds on each game. Create yourself a ranked list.

Just make sure to update your list as new games come out. Let’s be real. Nobody has time for that.

Fortunately, we do the hard work for you. At least for the top 10 best instant games!

Keep scrolling for the Top 10 List of SC Lottery scratcher games with best overall odds of winning this month.

STOP wasting money! See the FREE list of the Top 10 SC Lottery Scratch Offs with the Best Odds of Winning! Get an edge – a Lotto Edge

2 years after PennLive investigation, auditors raise questions about prize claims in S.C. Lottery

Following a 2017 PennLive investigation, auditors have raised questions about suspiciously frequent prize claims in South Carolina’s lottery.

South Carolina’s Legislative Audit Council released an audit on Thursday that found 18 people claimed 50 or more prizes greater than $500 between 2008 to 2017. Based on statistical analyses, auditors said those patterns were “highly improbable” and may indicate claimants purchased tickets through transactions not authorized by state law.

Andy Young, audit manager, told PennLive the agency’s audit was spurred by PennLive’s 2017 investigation and media reports in other states about improbable win patterns.

PennLive found that small groups of players in many states, including Pennsylvania, have claimed lottery prizes greater than $600 at a rate that can’t be readily explained by luck or frequent playing.

“It turned out to be the case that we had similar patterns,” Young said.

The South Carolina Legislative Audit Council consulted Philip Stark, a statistician at the University of California Berkeley, to conduct its analysis. PennLive relied on Stark for its own analysis.

The agency concluded that South Carolina’s most frequent prize claimants may be engaged in ‘discounting’. Discounting is a practice where players resell winning tickets to others at a discounted rate to avoid having their winnings withheld by the lottery to settle debts, like past-due taxes, student loans, child support, or other court-ordered payments.

The agency views the practice as illegal. In addition, it notes in a summary report, “the buyers may be seeking to launder money earned from criminal activity”.

The agency recommended that the lottery adopt a formal, statistical methodology for assessing and investigating frequent prize claiming in the future. The agency also recommended that the South Carolina legislature separate responsibility for investigating lottery-related misconduct to another agency.

South Carolina’s Lottery, like all U.S. lotteries, is responsible for selling lottery tickets in addition to ensuring retailers and player comply with state laws. Young said that, based on his agency’s research, that dual role creates a potential for conflicts of interest.

“Our view is that when you’re responsible for both, if you find misconduct that may affect sales, you may be less likely to investigate it,” Young said.

The report points to a scandal in Ontario, Canada in 2007, where store clerks and owners were secretly stealing winning prizes from lottery players. State investigators found that lottery officials ignored unusually frequent claims for years because they feared investigations would dampen sales.

South Carolina isn’t the only state to look deeper at frequent winning in response to PennLive’s reporting, which was produced in collaboration with the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism and several out-of-state media outlets.

In 2017, after reporters presented an analysis of frequent winning to officials in Massachusetts, officials opened criminal investigations and implemented a policy to withhold prizes from people who claimed large prizes with suspicious frequency.

In April, Clarance Jones, a Massachusetts man that PennLive identified in 2017 as the nation’s most frequent prize claimant, pled guilty to federal charges. Jones bought millions of dollars worth of winning tickets from other players in order to help them avoid paying taxes.

The Pennsylvania’s Lottery, meanwhile, says its stance on frequent winning has largely remained unchanged since 2017.

In its reporting, PennLive found that more than 200 people claimed more than 50 Pa. Lottery prizes greater than $600 between 2000 to 2016. An analysis by Stark – the Berkeley statistician – found many of those win tallies improbable.

Ewa Dworakowski, a spokeswoman for the Pa. Lottery, said Monday that the lottery investigates retailers who claim prizes frequently and checks to see if frequent winners are related to those retailers.

However, it views frequent wins by the general public as simply the result of frequent playing.

“Other than cross-checking against the retailer database, we do not investigate claims by the general public,” Dworakowski said. “We have no reason to do so as they are not subject to lottery policies, regulations, or procedures.”

[Editor’s note: This story has been been corrected to include the number of prizes won by the 18 lottery players identified by the South Carolina Legislative Audit Council. It has also been edited to clarify one of the agency’s recommendations.]

Note to readers: if you purchase something through one of our affiliate links we may earn a commission.

Disclaimer

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement, Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement, and Your California Privacy Rights (each updated 1/1/20).

© 2020 Advance Local Media LLC. All rights reserved (About Us).
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Local.

Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site.

2 years after PennLive investigation, auditors raise questions about prize claims in S.C. Lottery Following a 2017 PennLive investigation, auditors have raised questions about suspiciously ]]>